ABSTRACT
Background: Increasing availability of highly effective cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy (HEMT) has improved the quality of life and long-term prognosis for many people with CF. Thus, more people with CF are considering parenthood. Almost all menwith CF (MwCF) are infertile because of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD). Based on CF animal models, CBAVD occurs early in gestation and is unlikely to be reversible using HEMT, but assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs) can enable MwCF to father children using the sperm in their testes. Animal reproductive models suggest no HEMT teratogenicity, and the amount of exposure of the fetus to HEMT via absorption of seminal fluid through the vaginal wall is predicted to be negligible, although to ensure no sperm exposure to HEMT, the life span of sperm would require MwCF to discontinue CFTR modulators for approximately 3 months before ART. Because abrupt discontinuation of CFTR modulators may result in health decline, MwCF and their providers must consider all potential risks. There are no published data in MwCF regarding use of HEMT during conception and partner pregnancy. Method(s): Beginning in August 2021, CF center staff in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia completed a two-page anonymous questionnaire regarding MwCF who used CFTR modulators during ART (sperm retrieval and in vitro fertilization) or natural conception with subsequent partner pregnancy. Result(s): Providers have submitted 34 surveys for MwCF on CFTR modulators whose partner became pregnant after use of ART (n = 32) or natural conception (n = 2). The median age of the samplewas 32 (range 24- 43). Fifteen were homozygous for F508del, median percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 76% (range (22-111%), and median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range 18.5-32.1). Twenty-three were taking elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. The median time that MwCF were taking CFTR modulators before partner conception was 18 months (range 0-82). One newly diagnosed man initiated HEMT after sperm retrieval. Four MwCF stopped CFTR modulators before sperm retrieval, one of whom experienced pulmonary decline. None of the 19 MwCF whose condom use during pregnancy was known used condoms. Fetal complications in partners of MwCF included three first-trimester miscarriages, two* COVID, two breech presentation, two* vaginal bleeding, and one vasa previa. None of the complications were deemed definitively related to use of CFTR modulators. One MwCF experienced testicular infection after sperm retrieval#. Postpartum complications included three# infants with hypoxemia requiring neonatal intensive care unit stay, three maternal blood loss, one forceps delivery, and one caesarean section. No congenital anomalies were reported for any infant. (*/# overlap). Conclusion(s): Use of CFTR modulator therapy during partner conception and pregnancy in 34 MwCF has not resulted in higher-than-expected miscarriage rates or congenital anomalies. Providers should consider the risk to the health of MwCF combined with the lack of teratogenicity in animal reproductive models and limited safety data in the human fetus before discontinuing CFTR modulators before ART or natural partner conception. Survey collection is ongoing;results will be updated for presentationCopyright © 2022, European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug use in pregnancy and lactation is challenging. It becomes more challenging in pregnant and lactating women with certain critical clinical conditions such as COVID-19, because of inconsistent drug safety data. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the various drug information resources for the scope, completeness, and consistency of the information related to COVID-19 medications in pregnancy and lactation. METHODS: Data related to COVID-19 medications from various drug information resources such as text references, subscription databases, and free online tools were used for the comparison. The congregated data were analyzed for scope, completeness, and consistency. RESULTS: Scope scores were highest for Portable Electronic Physician Information Database (PEPID), Up-to-date, and drugs.com compared to other resources. The overall completeness scores were higher for Micromedex and drugs.com (p < 0.05 compared to all other resources). The inter-reliability analysis for overall components by Fleiss kappa among all the resources was found to be 'slight' (k < 0.20, p < 0.0001). The information related to the older drugs in most of the resources, provides in-depth details on various components such as pregnancy safety, clinical data related to lactation, the effect of the drug distribution into breast milk, reproductive potential/infertility risk and the pregnancy category/recommendations. However, the information related to these components for newer drugs was superficial and incomplete, with insufficient data and inconclusive evidence, which is a statistically significant observation. The strength of observer agreement for the various COVID-19 medications ranged from poor to fair and moderate for the various recommendation categories studied. CONCLUSION: This study reports discrepancies in the information related to pregnancy, lactation, drug level, reproductive risk, and pregnancy recommendations among the resources directing to refer to more than one resource for information about the safe and quality use of medications in this special population.The present study also emphasizes the need for development of comprehensive, evidence-based, and precise information guide that can promote safe and effective drug use in this special population.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lactation , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Reproducibility of Results , Breast Feeding , Milk, HumanABSTRACT
Favipiravir is an antiviral drug that has been shown to treat a variety of life-threatening infections, including Ebola, Lassa, and the COVID-19 virus. It's a pyrazine carboxamide derivative with antiviral action that targets RNAdependent RNA polymerase enzymes, which are required for viral genome transcription and replication. Favipiravir is an antiviral previously indicated for influenza and Ebola, which has shown some promise in early trials for treatment of COVID-19. The nucleoside analogue favipiravir is rapidly metabolized in host cells which disrupts viral synthesis and leads to mutagenesis The mechanism of action of the Favipiravir and Side effects like QTc prolongation or teratogenicity pose risk to extensive community application discusses in this review. In this article, we have tried to provide a comprehensive, evidence-based review of this drug about synthesis, Pharmacology, Mechanism of Action, Antiviral activity, Consequences.
ABSTRACT
The proceedings contain 119 papers. The topics discussed include: Nigeria is making progress implementing the active drug safety monitoring and management scheme for new and repurposed antituberculosis drugs;analyzing the U.S. post-marketing safety surveillance of COVID-19 vaccines;nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs exposure in complicated acute community-acquired bacterial infections, a French multicenter case-control study;evaluation of the need for specific quantitative signal detection strategies for the pharmacovigilance of vaccines;accesses to emergency department and hospitalizations in new users of biologic therapies for ulcerative colitis in Tuscany: the MICHELANGELO study;machine learning on drug-specific data to predict small molecule teratogenicity;preventing an opioid crisis in Europe: an overview of measures to support medicines regulators;and presentation of safety risks throughout the product lifecycle.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with significant maternal morbidity and increased rates of preterm birth. For this reason, COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been endorsed by multiple professional societies, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, despite the exclusion of pregnant women from initial clinical trials of vaccine safety and efficacy. However, to date, little data exist regarding the outcomes of pregnant patients after COVID-19 vaccination. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant patients. STUDY DESIGN: A comprehensive vaccine registry was combined with a delivery database for an integrated healthcare system to create a delivery cohort that included vaccinated patients. Maternal sociodemographic data were examined to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Pregnancy and birth outcomes were analyzed, including a composite measure of maternal and neonatal pregnancy complications, the Adverse Outcome Index. RESULTS: Of 2002 patients in the delivery cohort, 140 (7.0%) received a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy, and 212 (10.6%) experienced a COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. The median gestational age at first vaccination was 32 weeks (range, 13 6/7-40 4/7 weeks), and patients vaccinated during pregnancy were less likely than unvaccinated patients to experience COVID-19 infection before delivery (2/140 [1.4%] vs 210/1862 [11.3%]; P<.001). No maternal COVID-19 infection occurred after the vaccination of pregnant patients. Factors significantly associated with increased likelihood of vaccination in a multivariable logistic regression model included older age, higher level of maternal education, being a nonsmoker, use of infertility treatment for the current pregnancy, and lower gravidity. Compared with unvaccinated patients, no significant difference in the composite adverse outcome (7/140 [5.0%] vs 91/1862 [4.9%]; P=.95) or other maternal or neonatal complications, including thromboembolic events and preterm birth, was observed in vaccinated patients. CONCLUSION: In this birth cohort, vaccinated pregnant women were less likely than unvaccinated pregnant patients to experience COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with increased pregnancy or delivery complications. The cohort was skewed toward late pregnancy vaccination, and thus, findings may not be generalizable to vaccination during early pregnancy.